The table chart illustrates information about UK people giving charity by age range in the period of 1990 and 2010. This data is measured in percentage there are five different age groups are given.
Overall, the chart has the least amount at the youngest group, which is 18 to 25, in both periods. In 1990, the highest percentage reached more than 40%, in 36 to 50 age group. Compared to less than 40% for 51, 65 in 2010.
At the youngest group, there is more than 15% british people donated in 1990, meanwhile there are around 7,5% in 2010. The age range of 26 to 35 measured slightly above 30% and under 25% in 1990 and 2010 respectively. For the third group, both periods have around 6% difference with more than 40% in first period and 35% sharp at the last period.
The oldest group, above 65, show that the last period has the higher percentage with about 35% and slightly more than 30% in 1990. In 51 to 65, they almost reached 40% in 2010 and it could not over 35% in first year.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- he chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39459459459 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16718335882 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0726943107 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207856656547 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988872875343 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098413355751 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151796660166 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101187105876 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.