What do you think about playing ‘no smoking’ cautionary videos in the beginning of a feature film in a theatre? Do you think it really helps people to quit smoking? Do you think it is necessary?
Recently, the government has ordered to play 'no smoking' advertisement before playing the movie in the cinema halls. It has created debate across the world, and many people think awareness programs are required and help citizens to avoid the tobacco and other drugs, whereas opponent thinks otherwise. In my opinion, these cautionary advertisements will educate people with the side-effects of smoking and other drugs. This essay will demonstrate various facts and arguments, and it will lead to a conclusion.
To commence with, advertisements play an essential role in educating people. It has been observed that most of the people are excited to go to the movie theatre and they are focused before the starting on the movie. So running a ‘no smoking’ cautionary video at the start of a movie in the cinema hall is the best way to grab the focus of the people. For instance, a study conducted by Cinema Society suggest that 40% of people are influenced by the advertisements.
On the other hand, many people think that it does not have any concrete result as most of the people ignore the advertisement once they leave the movie hall. Also, some people think it is wastage of time as advertisement takes a good amount of time before the actual movie starts. Last but not the least people think their mood gets spoiled because of the gross and ugly advertisements.
In conclusion, in the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that statutory warnings and cautionary videos are beneficial for society and citizens.
- Government should create better network of public transport availablefor everyone or build more roads owning population. 77
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position Support your point of view with details from your own experiences observations or reading 60
- government focusing on improving transport or build roads for private vehicles 48
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. 80
- Some universities deduce students' marks if work is given late. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts, and it will lead to a conclusion. To commence with, advertisements play an...
^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e the starting on the movie. So running a 'no smoking' cautionary video...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are influenced by the advertisements. On the other hand, many people think tha...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the gross and ugly advertisements. In conclusion, in the view of arguments ...
^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re beneficial for society and citizens.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0390625 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83252420279 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56640625 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.572885479 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.5 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21336693508 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073643973178 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048673236571 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115608787157 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473017071932 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.