The bar chart shows the annual sales and profits of ABC Electronics in millions of US dollars over the period 1991 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
The given bar chart compares the amount of sales and profits in ABS Electronics over 10 years through 1991 to 2000. The numbers are expressed in millions of US dollars.
As it is obvious, a considerable quantities of sales experienced in contrast by a small amount of earnings over the whole years.
The annual takings stayed approximately similar level about under 20, over the 10 years. The maximum turnover referred to 1997, reached to 16 million. In comparison to it, the selling amount was really much more. In 1991 and 1992, the selling had the same amount 100 million. After 2 years, the trading slightly increases to 112 million dollars. A dramatic improvement in selling continued until it reached to 135 in 1995. The sales gradually went up over 1997 to 1998, arriving to 149, 152 million respectively until in 1999 peaked at highest amount 158 million. However, it declined to 154 million in 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-07 | arianamirkiai | 78 | view |
2018-10-17 | javad_70 | 61 | view |
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people How does competitiveness affect individuals Is competitiveness a positive or negative qualities 88
- It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the material status of adults Americans in two of the years. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive and the table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during 1990s.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make com 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'quantity'?
Suggestion: quantity
...ars. As it is obvious, a considerable quantities of sales experienced in contrast by a s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it declined to 154 million in 2000.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, really, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94193548387 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66347710742 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632258064516 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7965866951 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6363636364 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212713848501 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764926644939 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614679615117 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153855522795 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857607177173 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.