Nowadays most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree?
Although pursuing an university degree has long been considered essential for getting into the labour market, there is a school of thought that vocational training is rather what the job market demands. While I agree that vocational skills are needed in practice, academic learning still proves its merits in many aspects.
First of all, it is undeniable that studying for a degree at university is considered a crucial factor in getting future work opportunities. Each year, there are millions of applications for tertiary education, and the competition is increasingly intense, which can prove the pivotal importance that the society places on having an academic qualification. Also, rather than getting right into the labour market, that having a more in-depth insight of what students are excelled at and how they decide their career path is preferred and takes time, and universities provide them a chance to do that. Moreover, even though people often think of schools for the main task of teaching subjects rather than practical work-related skills, the fact is that students learn many important soft-skills that are beneficial for their future work, such as problem-solving skills, self-learning ability and teamwork.
Secondly, for some typical niches of profession, a relevant academic background is a prerequisite for selecting candidates for an expected job, whereas taking only vocational training cannot give students adequate credibility. In particular, law, medicine or teaching are those exemplary ones that require abundant time of acquiring specialised knowledge before performing in reality. The time at universities are imperative for them to absorb all those knowledge, and only by learning for such a long time period can they become really qualified for their future career.
All in all, although vocational education nowadays helps the society to solve the problem of skilled labour shortage, I believe that those with tertiary education background are still in favour, in terms of both their knowledge and qualified skills for preparation of future career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-18 | ngannguyenftu1996 | 86 | view |
- A lot of children spend too much time watching TV or playing video games. How do you think this problem influence the children, the families and the society? What measures should be taken to solve it? 89
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives? 84
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree? 86
- Many people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Although pursuing an university degree has long been conside...
^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'those knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; those knowledges
...s are imperative for them to absorb all those knowledge, and only by learning for such a long t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, in particular, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92189839563 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2804584203 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.0 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137888674376 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591476688953 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582960423614 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908745714994 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343854689663 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.