Cinema attendance by age group
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cinema attendance classified by age group in Britain between 1984 and 2000.
In general, the percentage of all groups increased throughout 16 years and people from 15 to 24 years old went to the theater more than other groups.
Young people of 15 to 24 years old were interested in cinema the most with about 17% in 1987 then gradually went up and fluctuated in the period of 1991 and 1995. The figure finally ended up with over 52% in 2000, this number was by far other groups of age.
The proportions of cinema attendance who were 7 to 14 years old and 25 to 35 years old were about 10% and 4% in 1984, respectively. The figures then steadily rose up and were almost the same with over 30% in 2000. People who were more than 35 years old less rather went to cinema than younger people with nearly 0% in 1984 then this number slightly increased to over 10% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | vuongthaolinh | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 82
- Marriages in America 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- places where people gain access to the Internet between 1998 and 2004 67
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...about 10% and 4% in 1984, respectively. The figures then steadily rose up and were ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43195266272 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33116570233 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4202484763 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226802997572 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125139232848 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132642702139 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181924073926 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14637970472 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.