Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Being a teacher is a hard job in the human history. If you are a teacher you have so many responsibilities to against your students. Their improvements and evoluation in the life depend on your capability to communicate with them. Some of the authorities claim in this communication, being relate well with students is more significant than excellent knowledge of the subject being thought and I totally aggree with them. There will be 2 reasons to support this idea in the following paragrapshs, such as the importance of the learning by student, being a better person.
Firstly, the teacher can not teach what he or she needs to teach to class without good relations. As normal people do the relations have significant effect on the communication. Like my history techer in university. Nobody in the university tried to learn history before Professor Murat. He has good relations with student, talking with them discussing the Turkis history with them. He was really good at with that and now I can easily debate about Turkish history with anyone. He was a reason to support this idea.
Secondly, the main issue is how much has been learned by students and what is the quality of this learning. As a student, I have experienced so many different types of teacher and from this experience I can say the teachers who I can relate easier have more effect on my life. Because the teaching process can not be end by the class the students has to learn ethical and moral hazards as well. However, a teacher who do not relate with students can never teach this kind of points. Although, this situation can affect the classroom negatively, since the teacher is not good at relations with children the transition of the informations can be hard also. I believe the first responsibility of the teacher is growing the better people. Since the world needs them in the future and now, a teacher who can understand the emotions and personality of the students can make so my changes positively in a life. For that, the teacher has to hav ethe ability of relating with the students easily. To being a better person is more significant than to cover the all chapters in the book.
As a conlusion, teachers have two main responsibily against the students; making them better people and teaching them as much as possible to teach in a quality. To make these responsibilities in real life, we can say the ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledege of the subject being thought, without a doubt.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern life is easier than life in the past.Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ur capability to communicate with them. Some of the authorities claim in this communication...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e or she needs to teach to class without good relations. As normal people do the ...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...teach to class without good relations. As normal people do the relations have sig...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...bate about Turkish history with anyone. He was a reason to support this idea. ...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ng. As a student, I have experienced so many different types of teacher and from this experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nsition of the informations can be hard also. I believe the first responsibility of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than excellent knowledege of the subject being thought, without a doubt.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, as to, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8091954023 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79217713224 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455172413793 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6457138286 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9565217391 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375708788027 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114584722204 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10468984075 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260430357685 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816814313375 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.