The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
Choosing the best traveling ways has been an appealing topic. Numerous travel writers over the world argue that travel in group that led by a tour guide is the best way of traveling. Personally, I agree with this statement due to the following reasons.
On one hand, personal enjoyments draw much of my attention. It is well known that when a group have a trip that planned by the traveling agencies, travelers are stand a golden chances to have no worry about traveling aspects such as where to go, what they will eat. Hence, travelers are likely to spend more time with each other in group, which encourage people to strengthen their relationships and bring traveler funny moments. More interestingly, it is possible for travelers who have their trip led by tour guide to improve their time management skill. Indeed, because tour guide have carefuly planned the trip, hence, travelers need to be follow the schedule or if they want to chance the plan, they have to carefully calculate their time. Consequently,t travelers are certain improve their time management skill, which is good for everyone. With no doubt, travel in group led by a tour guide brings travelers a lot of enjoyments.
On the other hand, it is claimed that traveling agencies always care about their profit but they do not care about the quality of the trip. Therefore, travelers are bound to filled with angriness. However, it is unnecessarily the case. In fact, traveling agencies have their customer due to their reputation and reliabilities. As a result, if they do not care about their service quality, they are likely to lost their customer and decrease their profits. In addition, because of the careness of the service quality, all service with different price is certain to bring as much relaxed moments for customer as they can. Accordingly, there is a likelihood that travelers who hire a tour guide stay away of thinking about their work, their life. Hence, a trip brings customer a lot of relaxed moments. As a result, it is possible for customers to refresh their mind and improve their life quality. By and large, the idea of traveling in group that led by tourguide is the best way to travel.
All in all, the personal enjoyments and the happiness moments the trip led by tour guide brings are the convincing reasons for my agreements. It is highly recommended that people should carefully consider my writting to make a right decision on choosing way to travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- Do you agree or disagree that with the following statement? It's more important for the government to spend money to build art museums and music performance centers than to build recreational facilities (such as swimming pool and playgrounds). 76
- Do you agree or disagree? Student activities do as much benefit as academicstudy. 70
- Television programs directed towards young children should not be allowed 70
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 758, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , t
...fully calculate their time. Consequently,t travelers are certain improve their tim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87799043062 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66252895967 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452153110048 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1965229925 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6818181818 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402670115507 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145685577523 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177616612735 0.0737576698707 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313580454788 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140696878103 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.