Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Some people think that protecting animals and birds is excessively attracting concern and resources of society. Personally, I would argue that although much attention and a large budget are given, the protection of wild species is worth being focused on.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people are paying much attention and allocate many resources to protect wildlife. First, many non-governmental organizations have been globally established, the vision of which is to guarantee the survival of wild animals and birds. This undoubtedly attracts a great deal of social attention via a variety of their programmes. For example, The WildAid Campaign whose aim is to protect endangered species has drawn incredible community’s attention by appointing the football star David Beckham as its lead ambassador. Second, being globally conducted, some protection programmes could cost a huge amount of money to build infrastructure or carry out researches. If they are not allocated budget enough, their aims are hardly achieved.
However, I believe that the current social concern and budget are really necessary because of the importance of nature. The first reason is that protecting wild animals and birds would maintain the balance of the ecosystem, which ensures the survival of various creatures on the earth, and the human race is of no exception. If just only a few species became extinct, the ecosystem would be disturbed, threatening the existence of a vast number of other species. Additionally, because natural habitats are really crucial for human life, preserving the habitats to protect the wildlife significantly benefits human. For instance, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb CO2 and stabilize the earth climate.
In conclusion, while much concern and many resources are focused on the protection of wild animals and birds, these creatures deserve to be protected because of their vital role in human’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
- The mobile phone is used both for work and personal phone calls at all times of the day, every day of the week. Do you think this has more positive or negative effects both for individuals and society? 67
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to ear meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 96
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic result, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city discuss both views and give your opinion 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9781351361 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5933410192 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238130267767 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794713068739 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740161084799 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168736351207 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738219854531 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.