In the development of technology, the human has an easy access to follow about an up-to-date information. Moreover, this case will make a person have some options to make their own decision. But, both parties have their reason to the argument that whether, currently, we have many alternatives or not. And I definitely agree that more choices are caused by the improvement of technology at the present.
To begin with, better access to the world by using technology will make sure that people know about the factual data so that it would increase the prevalence of information. The exchange communication in each people is the reason. For illustration, I want to continue my study about the aerospace engineer in the TU Delft University, but, in the same time, my friend who has studied in the UK told me that the UK is more appropriate because It can help to conduct research there. So, by technology such as social media, the information that people take would be easy and this is why today we have many options.
Sometimes, money and location can be the most reason to expand the number of choices. For instance, in the other part of the world, there is some community that hasn't choices because they live in a remote area. This place isn't connected with media communication. They can not live in downtown because they don't have money. They can't choose the career path because they do not study as modern people do.
In conclusion, the information that comes from modern technology will give people to generate some options. Moreover, no one has many preferences because he or she can not access the information directly.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 67
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 89
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 78
- The diagram illustrate how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...evelopment of technology, the human has an easy access to follow about an up-to-date informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...the world, there is some community that hasnt choices because they live in a remote a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... they live in a remote area. This place isnt connected with media communication. The...
^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y can not live in downtown because they dont have money. They cant choose the career...
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...town because they dont have money. They cant choose the career path because they do ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86379928315 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71218427211 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3568218788 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179911452614 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596759592122 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456532851428 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104019808778 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246598840337 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.