The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The graph compares the sales of mobile phone in terms of five different manufacturers in three different years 2009, 2011, and 2013.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the sales rate for Samsung and Nokia were the highest among the other brands in all three particular years. Whereas the lowest number of mobile phone sold out was ZTE (except for the year of 2009).
In 2009, Samsung sold out approximately 235 million units, where the figure for Nokia was significantly higher with almost 450 million units, almost doubled the Samsung’s sales rate. Apple sold out the least with only about 20 million units. In 2011, Nokia still kept the record as the highest sales of the year compared to other brands, which was above 400 millions, but was a decline compared to its own brand. Similar to 2009, the figure for Samsung increased their sales, which exceeded 300 million units.
Throughout three years, Nokia and LG were the only manufacturers that had their sales decreased, in which gradually for LG and significantly for Nokia between the year of 2011 and 2014, from around 410 million units to approximately 250 million units respectively. Although ZTE was one of the growing companies, it had the slowest sales rate, where less than 10 million units were sold in three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | torang | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | Sadullayev Nodirbek | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-17 | torang | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | view | |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 86
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories. 67
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a newcountry. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking? 61
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9495412844 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49047085516 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7621773811 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153139688235 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759763073178 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717772256591 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1277674756 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812212624557 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.