The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
The pie graphs illustrate the percentage of expenditures on different purpose in a European country in two separate years 1958 and 2008.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that many major changes occurred after 50 years, one of which was food, where its sale in 1958 was the highest compared to the others, but the figure dropped dramatically in 2008.
In the year of 1958, European spent 32% on food. However, this number decreased significantly to only 12%, making food one of the lowest figures in 2008. Similar to food, money spent on entertainment also fell after 50 years, from 13% to 6% respectively. Clothing was also the category with its proportion declined for 2%.
In contrast, the proportion of money used on residence and luxury goods rose the same percentage, which was 10%. The expenditure on travel and transport also grew more than twice the percentage in 1958, from 8% to 17% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-27 | nguyenduchuy2705 | view | |
| 2021-06-18 | yash0724 | view | |
| 2021-09-18 | phg_phg | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-15 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | nguyenduchuy2705 | view |
- The pie charts below show the proportion of energy produced by different sources in one country in 1985 and 2003 75
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories. 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 80
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 91
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96103896104 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78376858155 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.746584572 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201710509484 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901167718386 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580269473771 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123589218986 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432764451016 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.