Many people think that governments should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. Some others think that there are important priorities (eg.cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that some people argue for expenditure on improving faster forms of public transport. While the idea is the worthy aim, I believe that governments should focus on other vital aspects.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why governments should provide their citizens with faster forms of public transport. Firstly, this could help various people, such as commuters, to reduce a waste of time of travelling to work from home and vice versa. As a result, they will have more ample leisure time for their own lives and the productivity will be increased. Secondly, by adopting this method, there will be no situations that people are packed in the cramped and hot buses. They do not have to rush to go to work on time or get up so early to have a seat on a bus. Therefore, they can have more time to prepare themselves before going to work or study or enjoying their breakfast with their families.
On the other hand, I believe that spending money on other spheres is more important. One reason is that there is no undoubtedly that environmental pollution is now a pressing issue. More and more vehicles are produced annually and the exhaust emitted from those vehicles has had a detrimental effect on our atmosphere, especially in cities. As a result, there are more people go down with respiratory diseases and other kinds of cancer. Another reason is that the living cost in the countryside is increasing, much less in big cities. This makes a lot of people harder in meeting basic human needs and if governments have no policy to cope with this situation, there will be a decrease in economic growth.
In conclusion, although improving the speed of public transports is advantageous to some extent, it seems to me that it is better for governments to spend their budget on urgent issues such as environment and living cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | Hitesh12345 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | Huynh Dinh Ngoc Trac | 73 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many people think that governments should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. Some others think that there are important priorities (eg.cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es such as environment and living cost.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74223602484 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65587512843 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2352805365 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199457369782 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694475205867 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650406882535 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139320567139 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427680823741 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.