Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that computerization is happening and there is no need for public libraries because it costs a huge amount of money. Although I believe that computer technology has a considerate effect on people’s reading, I disagree that it can fully replace the libraries’ functions.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons can explain the benefits of computers for readers. Firstly, computers store an enormous number of kinds of books and references, which is easy for most people to assess their favourite books or references for their study or work. In addition, thanks to computers, it is advantageous for people who live far from the city centers and people who are busy to spend their time to go to the libraries can read books without worrying about the day of returning those books.
On the other hand, libraries still have their irreplaceable functions. Firstly, public library is one of the best places for students around the world to study because of its silence and its basic necessities for students to spend their time in. For example, in Vietnam, especially in large cities, libraries are beautiful, silent and spacious and they serve users not only the beverage but also fast foods. Secondly, traditionalists and elderly people have a hard time accustoming themselves to technology because of their ages and their ideologies so libraries are designed to be more compatible with them.
In conclusion, for the reasons I mentioned before, I strongly believe that both library and computer are important for readers and they are complementary to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | iceber9 | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | KatherineLQ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | hin07 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Hau Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people think that governments should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. Some others think that there are important priorities (eg.cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...to study because of its silence and its basic necessities for students to spend their time in. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they are complementary to some extent.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12307692308 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91928904371 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573076923077 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3512675123 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241271342927 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104597985546 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619772625911 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154153522303 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831850547641 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.