Maintaining public library is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people suppose that it is no longer necessary to remain public libraries due to the development of computer science in the modern word. While I agree that technology play a huge role as a source of information, I disagree that it can replace the unique function of public libraries in socio-economic life.
On the one hand, computer is an efficient tool for people to find out and keep abreast of up-to-minute information. Firstly, they create opportunities for people living in isolated areas to observe artworks and update the latest information such as the policies of government or new exploration from all around the word. Thanks to state of the art technology, people in mountainous areas in the north of Vietnam, for example, still be instilled the importance of democratic government, thus solidify the peace of country boundary. Secondly, the Internet cater for users with board spectrum of knowledge about science as well as society. For instance, websites like Wikipedia not only there is a wealth of identification and relative information but also give us picture illustrate those objects.
On the other hand, the public libraries are irreplaceable due to their several merits. The first reason is that by paying a visit to those places people can broaden their horizon knowledge. The majority of libraries nowadays not only have book exhibitions but also provide suitable hand-on activities for both children and adults encouraging interaction among attendances. As a result, they can apply lessons they have learned from books to real life, create long lasting knowledge. Another reason is that, distinguished from the internet, libraries is a source of reliable information which is organized in a clear and logical way. Indeed, all books in libraries are edited carefully by publishers be for publicized to the community. Beside, reader can also find out information about authors or methods to contacts to publisher if there is any mistake.
In conclusion, meanwhile I agree that computer technology has a significant part in helping people approach information, I would argue that there is no substitute for public library in people’s social life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | iceber9 | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | KatherineLQ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | hin07 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Hau Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- Consumption of Spreads 73
- the picture show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 81
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...ion from all around the word. Thanks to state of the art technology, people in mountainous areas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26780626781 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00611790049 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5708231015 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7333333333 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186822550632 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656185887137 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714733402262 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138171764956 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885409779181 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.