The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Restoration of ancient building in order to preserve cultural heritage of a country requires huge amount of money. I strongly agree with the notion that government should spend money to construct houses and roads to accommodate increasing population because shelter is the basic necessity of life and proper roads will decrease commuting time of people and goods. This essay will demonstrate impacts of utilizing finds on building homes and roads rather than on renovation of historic buildings.
To start with, population across the globe is increasing rapidly and it is estimated that by 2050 world would face huge problems due to scarcity of houses. In Addition, according to Maslow’s need hierarchy spectrum; food, clothing and shelter are the basic need of mankind. Culture and traditions remain at self-actualization stage which lies on the top of pyramid. Thus, consistent with this line of thinking, it is wise to spend money in fulfillment of needs to improve quality of life rather than preservation of culture.
Another insight that must not be neglected is development of roads. Admittedly, developed roads provide an ease to people for commuting within minimum time. Moreover, proper roads also decrease the trading cost of goods from urban to rural areas and vice versa. The National Highway Authority of Pakistan constructed Grand Trunk Road, which connects Lahore to other cities with a motive that transportation goods will decrease by 10% fortunately, this aim was achieved and remarkable results were documented. Seen in this light, it is fair to believe that spending money to improve standard of living have far better results than spending on renovation of old buildings.
To conclude, utilization of funds remain challenging concern for government that either to spend on preservation of historic buildings or to spend in building houses and road. Though, both concerns have their merits but I strongly believe that people nowadays are struggling to fulfill their basic needs for which they strive throughout their life. Hence, it must be the primary responsibility of decision makers to invest in current population than restoration of ancient buildings.
- In countries where unemployment is high education should only be obligatory upto primary school and not secondary. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think it is more important to spend time in developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ending on renovation of old buildings. To conclude, utilization of funds remain...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, in addition, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39941690962 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89006144995 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7908128175 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.466666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156168468092 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478138835348 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334113850241 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939533892854 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370686966038 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.