Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans. This money would be better spent elsewhere. Discuss both sides.
Financial decisions are always challenging for the government of both developing and developed nations. Either to utilise the funds to full fill basic necessity such as food, clothing, shelter, education and health or to spent in exploration of oceans to benefit the society and to improve quality of life. This essay will discuss benefits for exploring oceans and advantages for investing in attaining needs of people.
Firstly, almost 70% of the world is comprises of water and rest 30% is land. Many people across the globe are struggling for possession of land for living purposes. Exploring oceans and seas will provide help to build houses in order to solve shelter issues. Venice in Italy is one of the example where city is built in water in order to accommodate the population. Moreover, exploration of water will also help to generate cheap source of energy. According to research paper published by World Economic Forum reveals that electricity generated from water is 80% cheaper and Eco-friendly than that of other sources such as wind & fuel. Thus, it is clear that, exploration of water will resolve shelter and energy issues which are one of the heated argument these days.
On contrary, spending money in other sectors of economy like health, education is valuable in developing countries where more than 50% of people lies below the poverty line which means these people are even unable to attain basic necessity of life like Pakistan, India, some parts of Africa. In developing countries spending are restricted to these sectors only because exploration of water on cost of life of poor population is simply inhuman. Argument that money could spent on other target can not be debunked for these nations.
To conclude, government spending criteria differs as whether nation is developing or developed. However, investing in exploration of water will benefit society in long run as it will resolve issue related to shelter and energy generation whereas spending money to eliminate poverty is one of the basic agenda.
- Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults Do you agree or disagree 83
- Many parents believe that when their children read books for entertainment, they are wasting their time and they should only read serious educational books. What is your opinion? 73
- Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans. This money would be better spent elsewhere. Discuss both sides. 73
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 56
- Recently, many people know a few of their neighbors. What is the cause of this problem? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... Firstly, almost 70% of the world is comprises of water and rest 30% is land. Many people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om water is 80% cheaper and Eco-friendly than that of other sources such as wind ...
^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...mply inhuman. Argument that money could spent on other target can not be debunked for...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te poverty is one of the basic agenda.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1752265861 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62082638645 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4823573909 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118146511932 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401852895658 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430651092479 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749065973504 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297044229744 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.