Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Laws are set of principles designed to encourage a sense of propriety and decency in people’s behaviors. We cannot imagine a egalitarian society without law and order. Whether laws should be flexible enough to accommodate various circumstances? The answer is yes! I completely agree with the claim that it is necessary to change laws according to need of times and various situations. If laws are not flexible, their efficacy start declining and eventually law itself becomes a problem rather than a means of solving problems.
In the first place, with the march of time, people’s views on life and society are changing. People have begun to realize that some old beliefs protected by laws are not compatible with today’s school of thought. And hence demand for the adjustment of old laws to accommodate current problem is on the rise. For example, in many countries same-sex marriage is now legal whereas it was illegal until few years back. The surging sense of human equality and freedom is rendering our old laws obsolete. So, it has been essential to amend our laws according to the need of time.
In the second place, our thoughts on the lives are mostly influenced by our religion. And in many countries laws are compatible to the religious belief. However, in the modern age, every people want freedom. They have the liberty to follow their own path. Imposing religious constraints on them is against their right of freedom. So, laws based on religion need changing. As an example, The Islamist country Saudi Arabia has taken initiative towards lifting ban on women that are imposed by the religion. Women in Saudi Arabia are now allowed to have driving license and they are allowed to go to the cinema. They must have gained a sense of freedom after changes in laws.
Finally, some may argue that flexible may give way to those who want to exploit the loop holes of laws. For example, just recently, The United States and Canada passed a bill which allows the use and trading of marijuana for recreational purpose; however, odds are enough that drugs lords now can exploit these laws to their benefit. But, I think, government can handle such situations by the legislation of monitoring laws.
Finally, even though there may be the circumstances in which adjustment of the laws to new scenario can bring some challenge, such challenges are solvable. So, in order to respect the freedom of people, laws should be flexible enough.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 59
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 61
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ple's behaviors. We cannot imagine a egalitarian society without law and ord...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, whereas, for example, i think, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96368038741 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64847879057 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532687651332 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9354278805 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.52 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200054922949 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610865914737 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099103545875 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130044857342 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969304800272 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.