Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
It is said that based on different circumstances, times and places, laws should be flexible enough. Laws are a set of rules and guidelines in order to manage a country. Therefore, according to some conditions, I agree they should be flexible but for some situations not. In other words, I agree with this statement to some extent.
On the one hand, the government should consider flexible conditions for some rules. For example, some public and emergency rules. In all countries, all people should respect driving rules, and offenders are punished. But in some conditions, some organs such as hospitals or police stations and fire stations can circumvent the rules. For instance, they can ignore the red traffic light on busy streets or roads. In fact, the priority is with them. Sometimes, some rules based on time should change. For example, some rules about homosexuality should change in Islamic countries. In most Islamic countries, homosexuality is taboo, and I believe that this rule should be changed, and people should be free to choose their ways in their lives. This is a type of rule that should be changed based on time, and governments should be more flexible about it.
On the other hand, the government must be strict on some laws. For example, some rules related to nuclear energy. Governments must be strict about this rule because a little mistake can cause disaster. For instance, the using of atomic and chemical weapons in Hiroshima was one of the disasters in the world. International Human Rights Organization must act strictly about this rule, and officials should not be flexible about it. In addition to this, some laws about air pollution should not be flexible. Because they are related to people’s health, and authorities should be enough stubborn about them. For example, they should force people to use public transportations, and they should pass some strict rules about this subject.
To summarize, in my view, based on the type of rules, officials should be flexible about them and all rules must not be flexible enough.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Do you agree or disagree? 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree with this statement to some extent. On the one hand, the government should c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05263157895 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6851850083 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450292397661 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0929456073 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.1304347826 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8695652174 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52173913043 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248734606933 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926640250969 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107055920591 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211907293706 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636689270467 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.