A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
It is said that students should be required to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. I agree with this statement to some extent.
Education plays an important role in the transformation of individuals. It provides them with some qualities and adequate knowledge which are necessary for having a good life. Creating the same national curriculum can have some advantages for people especially those who live in deprived areas. In this way, all people in different regions are provided the same educational facilities. All people, ranging from rich to poor are required to study the same sources for their education. For example, in my country Iran all students need to study the same courses until they go to high school. They have the same books and sources for studying. All books are provided by the government for students, so, no one is not deprived of the educational facilities. Having the same national curriculum has also some benefits for the officials in the education system. In this way, all students are only required to take one entrance exam for going to school and holding one exam can have lower costs for governments instead of holding various exams based on different curriculums. In addition to this, all students can have the same opportunities to continue their education.
However, I believe that having the same national curriculum only can be performed for elementary and secondary schools. In high school, students should be allowed to follow their education based on their interests. For example, in my country Iran, in high school, students are asked to choose their favorite field of study to prepare for college or university. In this situation, officials cannot provide the same curriculum as each one has its own rules and modules. Some students decide to go to art school or tend to study science. In all regions, we cannot find art school, so students who are interested in art need to go to big cities to pursue their interests. All regions do not have access to the Internet, so in this situation, proving the same national curriculum needs a lot of budget and planning. Also, in this level of education, people cannot be forced to have the same curriculum regardless of their interest because this can lead to leaving education. This is not a desirable outcome for a country.
To summarize, in my view, performing the same national curriculum can be done only for a lower level of education, and having it from high school especially in some countries such as Iran is impossible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 58
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, for example, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98122065728 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7300540128 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431924882629 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1923312539 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2608695652 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5217391304 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3461606232 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121519023846 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144994069638 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282080176787 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160590696294 0.0667264976115 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.