Some people believe that government should spend money on New public buildings rather than renovation old building. to what extent do you agree or disagree
Historical architectures represent the culture and way of living in the past. Some people claim that it is futile to spend Money on repairing the historical infrastructure. I do not completely agree with this because to save historical architecture as important as build new infrastructure. This essay will discuss the both view point along with my opinion.
Why mend the old building? Historical buildings define progress of nation in history and define the significance of culture and traditions. However, nation and people who live nearby that buildings feel proud. Apart from this, the revenue generat from these buildings boost the economy of nation. These historical buildings attract the million of tourists from noop and corner of world. Moreover, Forte's and castle converted into hostels and museums for the perspective of earning. As an illustration, in Rajasthan, Jaipur city famous for Forte's and castle. Every year this city's earning more than 50 million rupees that most from tourism.
On contrary, many of historical buildings on the verge of collapse, before any mishap government should breakdown these buildings. Furthermore, much architecture from ancient times is in that bad shape that require handsome money for repairing. As an illustration, in 1998, one of the oldest building in India was brunout during the rainy season and 35 people died and more than hundred people were seriously injured.As a result, Indian government restricted the entry in old building untill inspection of old infrastructure were not completed.
To put in the nutshell, I pen down saying that Historical buildings is a treasure that our ansestors passed us and it is our duty to give it to next generations as a gift.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-17 | Sarwan1996 | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Historical architectures represent the c...
^^^
Line 6, column 380, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...season and 35 people died and more than hundred people were seriously injured.As a resu...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...n hundred people were seriously injured.As a result, Indian government restricted ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28727272727 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95397197232 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6453522775 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197810890604 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060529276871 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586371287083 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107795477209 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582986322741 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.