The table shows the cost of fish importation and the pie chart compares the source of fish in Canada, China and others in 1988, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, the highest record of value was made in 2000. Canadians were the major importers of fish over the period.
Regarding the table, in 1988, 6.57 billion dollars accounted for the overall value. However, after 4 years, the figure had increased notably by nearly 2 billion dollars, before attaining a significant rise to 10.72 billion dollars in 2000.
To the nations importations, in 1988, Canada had imported the largest quantity (60%) of fish to US, with around a quarter from other countries and just 13% from China. From 1992 to 2000, Canadian imports had declined drastically from 34% to 285, as opposed to a significant rise from 20% to 30% by their Chinese counterparts. Over the period, the proportion from other had fluctuated, but remained the highest in 2000 at 42%.
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050 78
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children’s activities. Thefirst chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in,whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate. 84
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 79
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9018404908 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56831828204 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.790301623 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246151516083 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109389227398 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109647916676 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17055315459 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129701227502 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.