In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Some would argue that the countryside should not be used for constructing new houses, however, others would view it as an alternative to overcrowded cities. This essay will argue that the countryside should be protected as this place is used to grow crops and rear animals and the produce is used for feeding the city population. Disturbing it will lead to extreme consequences.
Developing new suburbs over the land used for agriculture will impact the food supply to cities. Over centuries, farmers use their knowledge of weather for growing crops and this new development will force them to relocate to another place where they have no idea about climate change. This will impact the production and results in food prices to rise up. For instance, in 2014 News 9 reported that in Geelong, Australia the use of farmland for building purposes skyrocketed the price of rice as production was halved. A mismatch between the supply and demand forced the government to import rice from other countries on a higher price.
Moving farm animals to new grounds will possibly result in diseases and less production. Animals living in the countryside feed on the natural grasslands and these nutrients might not be available on the new location. Animals might also be forced to eat processed fodder which makes them sick and unproductive. For instance, in 2012 New York Times published a study which shows that relocation of cattle in San Diego shows a new kind of bacteria in the milk which caused hospitalisation of several people.
To conclude, the preservation of the countryside is important for the survival of humans and using this space for building houses will disrupt the ecological balance. Crops might get affected, production may be reduced and animals may develop new diseases that affect the inhabitants of the area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to work in the company s head office for six months Say how your work 78
- There have been several complaints about the reception area where the visitors to your company arrive. Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improved.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter, • Describe the compla 78
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol (gasoline). Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation of several people. To conclude, the preservation of the countryside is i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, so, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08637873754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75424699974 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554817275748 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0315865288 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214764508902 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745054755988 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048250263056 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137012559926 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198489760744 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.