The line graph illustrates the revenue of Adult’ fiction, Children’s books, and Education’s books in one country over the course of 4 years, starting from 2002.
In general, it is evident from the chart that the sales of children’s books was increased while the opposites were true for Adults’ fiction and Education’s books. In addition, the amount of sales of Education’s books was lower than two other books for most of the period.
With regards to the sales of Adult’s fiction, it began at 45 million was the highest among 3 book types. There was a considerable fall to 37 million in the sales of Adults’ fiction and then climbed to 40 million in 2004 before experiencing a marked drop to 30 million.
Meanwhile, starting at 34 million in 2002, the figure for sales of children’s books compared to 25 million that of sales of Education’s books. The figure grew to 42 in 2003, which was followed by a gradual rise to over 55 million in 2006. Similarly, the period from 2002 to 2003 saw a rapid climb from 25 to 32 million in the amount of sales of Education’s books, but later dropped to 25 million in 2005. The figure rose considerably and hit the highest point of just under 35 in 2006.
- The diagrams below show information about the number of UK university students and the government spending on each university studentSummaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 75
- Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, then, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89719626168 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2525647143 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0370180046 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461178784048 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224979485803 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173924661658 0.0843802449381 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345156660535 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141772531436 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.