Flourishing our knowledge about the world that we live in through, not only needs questioning our present sources of wisdom, albeit, if we want to augment our insight about our environment, we have to put our question authority on the subjects that we do not possess any knowledge about them indeed. For instance, the advent of science-fiction movies decades ago has led us to attribute a power to dare more in decoding things there were not any idea about them. Furthermore, merely attempting to devise about aspects of invented knowledge would not introduce us to new dimensions of existential universe. With considering that, questioning only accepted wisdom will conclude to a judgement just and definitely is not foment to seek outside the frame skeleton.
In 1950’s decade we had seen a revolutionary alteration in movie and film making industry by the appearance of new kinds of movies called science-fiction. These movies despite changing the entertainment study was a strong provoke for scholars to step in fields that they never have been through it. For example, the star-wars movies, despite being a series of awesome productions in the industry, it has been introducing us new methods for researching and deciphering universe. Like laser swords, it was only conceivable in cinemas however years later by the efficacious arose of those movies, we have seen a great enhancement in lasers industry especially in medial usages.
Similarly, devising only in acceding methods and knowledge would only inhibit us from new dimensions of this infinite universe, then it would occlude the way for advancements. Einstein has been introducing as one of the most reputed scholars of all time and that is because of ample inventions in different aspects. Without any doubt, if he used to question the presented criteria which was accepted before, he would not be able to ameliorate the knowledge of human being as this colossal amount. Hence, for adducing new rules from the world, a new vision is needed logistically.
“Think outside the box”, we have heard it frequently nowadays. The bombastic elevation of technology in our time is one of the consequences of this famous quote. As we have investigated on the history of acknowledgement and adroitness of people, we reach to this conclusion that, if we deem to attain new insights about the world, we should eliminate the ordinary frame-work of ourselves and try to devise more ways to observe without any skeleton.
Clearly, avoiding iterative judgement about the things we already know and ratiocinating new attitudes of the world, as it had declared, questioning the accepted knowledge is absolutely a fallacious move for enhancement because it is not introducing us to new aspects of endless wisdom. So far the advent of new facilities has always needed the questions on the things that we do not even know.
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 12
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 18
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 70
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 34
- Statistics gathered over the past three decades show that the death rate is higher among those who do not have jobs than among those with regular employment. Unemployment, just like heart disease and cancer, is a significant health issue. While many healt 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 719, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fomented'.
Suggestion: fomented
... a judgement just and definitely is not foment to seek outside the frame skeleton. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1858974359 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02955813245 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517094017094 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8758925404 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.764705882 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5294117647 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193288928783 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061373066089 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679624078013 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11428704528 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611730598343 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.