When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Architecture has a pivotal role in our society as many famous buildings have attracted global attention for their aesthetic beauty while boosting the economy through tourism. At the same time, functionality of buildings should also be considered since the main purpose of buildings are providing shelter when fulfilling specific requirements. Thus, this essay argues that both the intended purpose and aesthetic beauty are equally important.

First of all, buildings differ from one another based on its purpose. A house usually has limited number of floor levels than business buildings. It is considered to be a private space and has one specific purpose—living and raising a family. Yet, people often expect their house to be appreciated by others. It gives them a sense of pride and appreciation. For example, when my best decided to purchase a property with a house in it, the first thing he asked me was whether the house was pleasing to the eyes. He was also concerned if his family would love its outside beauty.

Moreover, aesthetic works are enjoyed by all. Many nations around the world such as the USA, the UAE and Australia are known for their exceptional constructions like the World Trade Centre, Birj khalifa and Opera house, Sydney. These buildings have made these nations very proud of their architectural skills, while increasing tourism, which brings economic benefits.

However, the intended use should also be taken into account lest people want to be disappointed in terms of functionality. For example, my cousin bought an expensive office, solely based on its good looks; he regretted the decision because it could not meet his requirements of durability and low maintenance.
In conclusion, buildings should be constructed keeping in mind their aesthetic value while being useful for the supposed cause. This will help the owner feel satisfied when being productive for the intended purpose.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...thing he asked me was whether the house was pleasing to the eyes. He was also concerned if h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29315960912 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81698135063 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635179153094 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5918002201 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107836874561 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336581991617 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272028366933 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602732054815 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239592214958 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.