Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
For reaching a certain position, whether it is the head of an organization or government sector, people go through a lot of studies and work. Ceasing this power is only the start of their productivity and the outcome is to be seen after a period of time. The question to be asked is how long this period should last. Some argue that it should not exceed 5 years others believe it can be more. In my opinion, the period that a CEO or politician or any person in power needs to be more than 5 years.
First of all, 5 years is not enough to see whether the person in power achieved all their goals and made their firm increase or decrease in power. Indeed, this time is only enough to initiate the work and correct the errors that have been done by the previous owner. To start performing the new plans set firms and or government has to thoroughly study and develop all the set of ideas in that plan which can consume a long period and efforts. For example, a politician that has recently got into the control of the education system will have to, especially if this sector suffered from a multitude of problems come up with a solution and during a great amount of his job will be only to correct the errors that this system had. Having the major errors corrected is when this person will be able to implement all the new plans to strengthen this sector. This being said, any person that reached power will need a great amount of time to reverse the difficult situation the firm or sector is in.
Secondly, 5 years is a period that is greatly asked for experience to obtain a job so how can a person leave o powerful job after it. While performing the worker acquires the necessities to perform their job perfectly which means that it is after this when they will be able to develop the enterprise. Moreover, the leadership is not a quality that people have in advance instead it is learned through experience and the activities done with different groups of employees. By way of illustration, a manager that has worked in a firm for a great duration will have understood the way their teamwork and how to motivate them. If this person wants to change their job the firm will try its hardest to keep them while other firms will try their hardest to get them. This example explains how important is the experience acquired through actual performance thus how important is the duration of their activities.
Thirdly, while working in a certain environment, a leader understands how the firm and its employees operate thus they know all the problems that it faces and how urgent some are with respect to others. They will know the best strategies that will solve them and the best plans to reverse them into profitable actions. This leader will know perfectly while designing a project, the set of plans they need to make and the hindrance that the firm will have. In addition, they will know the records that they need to review so as to prevent these obstacles. These people will definitely have all the possible resources to empower the organization thus they will revitalize it.
In conclusion, setting a specific period of time for leaders to perform is quite limiting if not harmful for the firms. These durations can be stated for some specific jobs but not the ones that are powerful as they need more time to know, correct then empower.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 75
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 16
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 60
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y and the outcome is to be seen after a period of time. The question to be asked is how long t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...heir teamwork and how to motivate them. If this person wants to change their job t...
^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ow the records that they need to review so as to prevent these obstacles. These people w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t. In conclusion, setting a specific period of time for leaders to perform is quite limitin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2755.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 600.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59166666667 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45483140403 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9180218233 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.791666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29166666667 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881851001491 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328624166117 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275751038684 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602784005379 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355255685625 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.