do you support dangerous activity like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. what are the reasons for that?

Essay topics:

do you support dangerous activity like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. what are the reasons for that?

Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently both by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that developing sport skills can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general point, learning skiing and bungee jumping can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in that fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which proved current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both physical activity And healthy benefits apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, professional skiing might increase the consequences of professional exercise. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of harmful activity is correlated negatively with vital issues. hence, it correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sport event far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of body injuries prove the significance of Olympic Games, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-09 arami 11 view
2018-04-26 masi1397 11 view
2018-02-15 Azzita 77 view
2018-01-23 Azzita 85 view
2018-01-23 Azzita 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...orrelated negatively with vital issues. hence, it correct to presume the preconceived...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'corrects'?
Suggestion: corrects
...negatively with vital issues. hence, it correct to presume the preconceived notion of t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76086956522 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1887236337 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708695652174 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4451743794 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678657375302 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022497721778 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279763483097 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0353799403526 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136168662793 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...orrelated negatively with vital issues. hence, it correct to presume the preconceived...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'corrects'?
Suggestion: corrects
...negatively with vital issues. hence, it correct to presume the preconceived notion of t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76086956522 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1887236337 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708695652174 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4451743794 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678657375302 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022497721778 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279763483097 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0353799403526 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136168662793 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.