Intelligent robots will be more widely used in the future. Is this blessing or a curse?. What is your opinion?
There is no denying the fact that intelligent robots have been gaining more and more popularity in society. Whether or not this is a real boon for us is still under debate. Personally, I am in favour of the reasonable application of robots.
Without a shadow of a doubt, intelligent robots have brought about automation in a variety of fields ranging from manufacturing and aviation to space science. This has enabled the world economy to develop in leaps and bounds. Take the automobile industry, where mass production as well as incredibly precise assembly work are required. But for gigantic robotic arms with the productivity considerably higher than manual workers, the whole industry would be held back in consequence of a substantial drop in manufacturing output. Furthermore, by virtue of intelligent robots, we are able to prevent calamities to a certain extent. To be more detailed, geologists can take advantage of robots to explore unstable geological environments, such as abandoned mines, complex cave systems, or both dormant and active volcanos, thus making accurate predictions and giving hazard warnings in good time.
Intelligent robots may, nevertheless, bring on a wide range of long-term consequences. In practice, such high-tech products have been used in a great number of luxurious hotels and casinos in Las Vegas to serve as receptionists, room service attendants and bartenders, etc., making thousands of local workers likely to lose their jobs. If left unchecked, the widespread use of robots may breed a vast army of the unemployment, which will become not only social but also economic burdens to any government.
Ultimately, intelligent robots certainly are and will be a great blessing for the human race as long as they are kept under our control. If not, they can pose a considerable threat to our social stability.
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Schools should emphasize academic subjects, which are more important for future jobs, rather than sports and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- You play a team sport with some friends Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn t able to play with you at the weekend You decide to write to him in hospital telling him about the match Write a letter to your friend In your letter tell him 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...ng more and more popularity in society. Whether or not this is a real boon for us is still und...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05878126011 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670033670034 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.285595238 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249316414154 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711623084877 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605281428194 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137783472244 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00566400949112 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.