The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of the atmosphere polluted by three sources in the UK between 1990 and 2005.
In general, the total amount of pollutants in the air witnessed a considerable fall in over of the period. Additionally, industry had the highest amount of air pollutants throughout the whole time frame, while the opposite is true of the amount of air pollutants from households.
Looking at the graph, the total amount of air pollutants decreased significantly from 7 million ton in 1990 to 4 million ton in 1999. After falling to under 4 million ton in 2002, there was a slight drop to just over 3 million ton by the end of the period.
Furthermore, the amount of air pollutants was the highest from industry throughout the period, falling from approximate 5.5 million ton in 1990 to 2 million ton in 2005, with the noticeable decrease between 1993 and 1996. By contrast, the amount of air pollutants was much lower from transport and households. In regard to transport, the amount of air pollutants remained relatively constant at about 1 million ton from 1990 to 2005, whereas the figure from households witnessed a decrease from just under 1 million ton in 1990 to approximate 0.1 million ton at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- Intelligent robots will be more widely used in the future Is this blessing or a curse What is your opinion 95
- Schools should emphasize academic subjects, which are more important for future jobs, rather than sports and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, whereas, while, in general, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83644859813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85037919276 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415887850467 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2804642899 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196504810565 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121328132752 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625273799665 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154259252716 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571493024455 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.