TPO26-It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.

Essay topics:

TPO26-It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.

Over the past few decades, the issue of whether children should continue their parent's job has received a great deal of attention from people and psychologists. Although some may argue that following the parent's job can reduce the risk of the failure for the childrens' careere, I as well as many others believe that childrens should have a right to choose their job by either their talents or interests. I am of the opinion that both of these viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.

First and foremost, a paramount reason why children should choose their future occupation by their own and not following their parents' job is that for being prosperous in every work interests play a crucial role. This means that if they choose a same job, they might fail in their career due to the fact that they are not interest on their work and they might not spend adequate time on their job. For instance, I have brother who was interested in engineering. My father enforced him to follow his occcupation as a merchant due to the reason that he is very prosperous and he wanted my brother to be successful as well. In short, my brother failed on this job since he was not fond on this job and he could not do his best.

A further reason for this view is that all the people are not successful in their job; therefore, following their careere might not be a reasonable work. In addition, children should find their talents and flourish them to be a successful person in the future. People who find their talents, is sometimes said that, can risk on their own job which is a significant desicion in life due to the fact that some significant success can be reached by take a risk on job. Take abrham lincolne as an example, his father was a conventional farmer. Despite of insisting his father, abraham did not follow his fathers' job and follow his dreams. As a reault, he find his talent in politic and after some year he became one of the greatest presidents of the united states.

On the other hand, it is occasionally said that parents have experience which can be transfer to the children and prevent them from failure. Moreover, they can guid their children to a correct way in their future job since they experience plenty number of ways on their job and they can recognize the harmful way. It is axiomatic that parents who are adept in some works can be helpful to be a guidance for their children.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned above, I can draw the conclusion that children should be free to choose their own job due to the reason that this decision not only limit their talents but also can tend them to the failure in their jobs on the future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-16 Chuppy 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user paras2 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... and follow his dreams. As a reault, he find his talent in politic and after some ye...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in brief, in short, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6306122449 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54998264606 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436734693878 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5800182765 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.055555556 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400497096758 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145805733818 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109045968537 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277100196654 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053647876898 0.0645574589148 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.