The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two pictures show the appearance of island in the old time and after the construction process
At a glance, we can see that overall of the construction concern to three type of tourist facilities in this island, such as accommodation, transportation, and recreations.
Looking at more detail on accommodation facilities, there are a dramatic increase in number of small hut for tourist with the receptionist point in the center of island. To support the tourist’s need for food, they can go to a restaurant nearby the receptionist office. This appearance is very different before the construction which is the island still has a large-scale of open spaces with only filled by some trees.
Turning to second type of island’s construction, the transportation as a crucial supporting element are built after construction to connect any newly point in this island. The mode of accessability are provided only for footpath and the vehicle tracks. Vehicle track is existed to connect the main area, reception-restaurant-Pler area. While, the connectivity of hut just can be reached by walking.
The last is about the recreation’s facilities which are improved by adding some leisure’s facilities such as swimming area in the edge of beach and the pler to support the ship and boat’s activities.
Remarkably, a dramatic shifting appearance on this island is very green with highly-caring protection for the nature where is no deforestation at all.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- MRT around the world 78
- Falling of Educational Standard 61
- Effects of Internet 61
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n area, reception-restaurant-Pler area. While, the connectivity of hut just can be re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40086206897 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62226720559 2.65546596893 136% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8280192271 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172174614403 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617424964338 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553814502209 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946194138059 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604891251409 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.