The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.
The graph makes a comparison of the proportion of people who give charitable money by different ages between 1990 and 2010 in Britain. In general, the percentages of aged 18 to 50 witnessed a decrease while the elders over 51 years rose slightly during the period.
Regarding the 18-aged group, accounted for the lowest figure of about 16 percent, it dropped significantly to approximately 7 percent. following this trend, the proportion of people who aged from 26 to 35 and 36 to 50, which started at more than 30 and 40 percent, they declined sharply to about 25 and 35 percent prospectively during the period.
On the other hand, the other groups seemed not to follow this trend, there was a slight increase in the percentages of people who aged between 51 and 65 or older, from nearly 35 and 33 percent to two-fifths and 35 percent prospectively throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | phamngocduyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | kulwa | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | KhangEriol | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | Kapil Kumar | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | RaghuVJoshi | 67 | view |
- IELTS Writing task 1 Pie Chart The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of the waste? 61
- IELTS Writing Task 1 - Pie chart 11
- IELTS Task 1 - TABLEThe table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- IELTS Task 1 TABLE 31
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years rose slightly during the period. Regarding the 18-aged group, accounted f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...gnificantly to approximately 7 percent. following this trend, the proportion of people wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ercent prospectively during the period. On the other hand, the other groups seem...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82119205298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83881261581 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2432770794 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.6 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176331857424 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108449094746 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863563846738 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13298736042 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982715210145 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.