The chart below gives the information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.
The line chart depicts data about the British people doing charity by different charity by different age groups in the year 1990 and 2010.
A perusal of an information indicates that people whose ages are (35-50) give more money on charity than rest of others. The least figures can be seen in the teenagers (18-25).
In 1990, less than 20% charity had given by adolescents while the numbers were significantly high for adults with more than 30% in the same year and it is projected to touch around 24% in the 2010 as compared to teenagers. Moreover, percentages were reached at the top of around 42% for young people (36-50) in the year 1990 but in 2010, the figures fluctuated slightly to 35%.
On the other hand, good amount of money had given by old infants (51-65) with nearly 40% in 2010 and 35% in year 1990. However, individuals aged more than 65 years, contributed less money in charity in 2010 with 35% and approximately 32% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | phamngocduyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | kulwa | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | KhangEriol | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | Kapil Kumar | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | RaghuVJoshi | 67 | view |
- The table shows the figure for imprisonment in thousands in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 67
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers; those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work perfromance. 78
- Nowadays the people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 89
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60119047619 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42692959208 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.680415856 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398301048465 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168807444198 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939885150855 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226482531837 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478200170637 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.