Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every student must have a class with more productivity. They need a useful class for learning class materials better and being ready for their future job. In this regard, some people hold the view that it is of vital importance to mainly focus on classes with no lecture and no discussion. However, there are other opinions which it is essential to have free discussions between professor and students without any lectures. As for this writer's opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First and foremost, the open discussion classes motivate both students and teachers. As these classes are the challenging one, the professor should always be ready for students' questions so, he must study new material and be updated. On the other hand, the students can have their question during the class and it helps them to have information about obscure points that comes to their minds. For instance, I had a free discussion sociology class last term. Everybody could speak about his/her idea and the other ones were allowed criticizing him/her. Due to the point that we had many theories to learn in sociology, this free discussion class motivated students and professor to read deeply about them and have confidence for speaking or criticizing in the class. As a result, this class provided excellent conditions for the students to boost their knowledge. This example clearly clarifies that how open discussion class can be more useful.
Furthermore, the open discussion classes are more exciting. Unlike the classes with the only lecture that is really boring, the classes with free discussion are so active. Students in monologue classes become frustrated and the class is not attractive for them but free speech classes are alive because of dialogue of people. By way of illustration, my friend had a class of sociology simultaneously by my class that I mentioned above, with another professor. This class was a monologue and as I friend said every student occasionally left the class because they felt sleepy. The class did not have any use for the students. " Had I picked the class with your professor, I would have a really exciting time" my friend mentioned. This experience drives the concept home.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that, although some people prefer monologue classes, open discussion classes would be more successful. Not only are these classes motivating, but also they are more exciting. Every field of study in universities should have these kinds of classes for helping their students move forward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Lao Zhiquan | 86 | view |
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- which one do you choose?governments spend money on public transportation or Internet access 67
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 78
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to class'
Suggestion: to class
.... They need a useful class for learning class materials better and being ready for th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...dents without any lectures. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, as for, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13023255814 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69221179083 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0407797197 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.24 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35767358208 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113742036852 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062277668043 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237745032743 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455058726834 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.