Should parents be held legally responsible for the actions of their children? Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position with
your own study, experience or observations.
Recently, legal responsibility for children's actions by parents has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what steps can be taken to tackle this challenge?". Whereas it is a widely held view that parents must remain accountable for their children's activities, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, children actions are bound up inextricably with parents' responsibility, which indicates they lead to both the legal and illegal actions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between social behavior and depression, as well as an exponential increase in children's achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of lawbreaking, is correlated positively with not only children actions but also parents responsibilities.
Within the realm of the educational system, without the slightest doubt, the child's activities attribute to well educating and improved skills, in that it would come down to families, schools, and universities. A salient example of such attribution is family members, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take discriminal activities for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint societies' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of children's activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that parents are legally responsible about their children's' activities. However, we perceive that, with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | reza_irani | 85 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportationavailable for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or expe 77
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – thatwe should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 88
- Should parents be held legally responsible for the actions of their children? Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position withyour own study, experience or observations. 85
- A cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. Howrealistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 85
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city.'Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81884057971 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33657687182 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670289855072 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.345928849 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253142998656 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799816977611 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663132640864 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144493932295 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756717344548 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.