The line chart reveals the usage of energy by different sources of fuel in American from 1980 and predicted the consumption to 2030.
It is clear that petrol and oil were the major source of energy consumption throughout the period. In spite of the fluctuation before 1995, the usage of petrol and oily steadily increased from 35 quadrillion units in 1995 to 47 units in 2030. By contrast, the nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower used for energy were the least significant, with only 4 to 5 quadrillion units from 1980 to 1030.
Regarding coal and natural, the trends of energy usage were similar between 1980 and 2012. The chart apparent showed that consumption of two fuels steadily increased to 24 units in 2012, following that the usage of coal expected to continue to rise to 30 units in 2030. On the other hand, the amount of natural gas consumed will remain stable at around 24 units after 2012.
Overall, while American will continue to rely on the petrol and oil for energy generation, nuclear and other sustainable sources remain less popular.
- The graph below compares changes in the both rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000. 73
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ce of energy consumption throughout the period of time. In spite of the fluctuation before 199...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90659340659 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60147863726 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0459678141 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176105757121 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890675959069 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637900657279 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116490739069 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606705872582 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.