Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Juvenile delinquency is becoming an increase concerns. To keep the crime rate within limits, some people reckon that the punishment for those young criminals should not be differentiated from the adults. As far as I am concerned, the practice is can be done on the condition that they commit crimes more than once.
The reason of advocate of the harsh punishment is that it is usually considered as an effective way of deterring the adolescents from reoffending. Besides, it is extremely unfair for the victims if the criminals who committed the major crime escaped from the sentence just simply because they are still young. Without the harsh punishment, moreover, the teenager would not realize the serious after effect of their heinous crimes and leave the victims and their families suffering.
However, juveniles do not have the same physical and mental condition as the adults, therefore, the punishment would not have much effect on them. For some of them, meanwhile, they do not have adequate endurance so that the penalty may destroy their whole life and future. Additionally, there is much greater possibility for them to reestablish the value, return to normal life and even shift gear to become the leader of the certain area. Compared with adult criminals, the young ones are more capable of learning from their mistakes.
In conclusion, I believe that naïve and young as criminals are, heinous acts should be punished regardless of the age, for the sake the long-term social benefit, rigorous education and chances should be offered to young offenders. However, if only they commit crimes again, there is no excuse for them to escape from the equivalent penalty as adults.
- the graph shows the percentage of people using the internet for different activities in a UK city between 2003 to 2006. 61
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 78
- the charts showe the percentage of male and female students getting top graded in 1960 and 2000. 67
- the graph shows the production of main fuels in the UK between 1986 to 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13357400722 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64717699421 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3486684823 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231845467822 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790556921717 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610929758539 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145269376047 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486019627858 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.