The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts given reveal some information with regard to the percentages of sales in New Zeland by online retail in 2003 and 2013.
As can be seen, there is a Stark contrast between two years one of the most noticeable features of the charts is that the figures of half of the items experienced a dramatic climb from 2003 to 2013, while half of them declined exponentially by about 27%. With regard to the 2003 chart, the numbers were 19% or above, of which the highest belonged to the travel, with not being quite twice as high as that of the lowest ( 37% for the former as opposed to 19% for the latter). Interestingly, the number for film/music was as high as that of clothes ( 27% for both).
Turning to 2013, the figures were ranged from 16% for clothes to 33% for film/music, with the highest was one-third of the numbers of books, travel and clothes put together. Importantly, the percentages of books and travel were 22%and 29%, respectively.
It is worth mentioning that, although the percentages of clothes and film/music were the same in 2003, the number of clothes plummeted down steeply from 22% to 16% while the figure of music/film witnessed a drastic surge from 22%to 33%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uite twice as high as that of the lowest 37% for the former as opposed to 19% for...
^^
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilm/music was as high as that of clothes 27% for both. Turning to 2013, the figu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6619047619 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59557009672 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8086279313 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.857142857 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151684321054 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856246331994 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959490867302 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122616356238 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113687581372 0.0819641961636 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.