Many museums charge for admission while do not charge at all. Do you think the advantages of not charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In many nations around the world, there are many galleries showcasing historical and cultural artifacts without charging any money to the visitors. While offering free visits to such sites has certain advantages, there are certain disadvantages worth considering.
The primary advantage by offering free entry to museums would be creating widespread awareness about local culture by attracting a number of local visitors and international tourist. Additional, this phenomenon would also enable educating the youth about their traditional values, as they are increasingly attracted to pop culture and are in danger of losing their identities. Therefore, such subsides can be justified as they showcase cultural heritage and enhance national pride.
On the other hand, various drawbacks can be noted. In first place, restoring ancient artifacts and preserving them would involve significant costs. Such sites are often a source of income for an administration to fund the excavation and archaeological research. Offering free entry would mean that funds should be obtained from elsewhere which might not be feasible for economically challenged countries. Additionally, if such sites are free to visit, people may consider them unworthy and less significant. On the other hand, if there are charges associated, people might consider visiting such sites valuable as part of their expeditions.
In conclusion, the disadvantages are of a greater importance compared to advantages. The entry charges paid by visitors are vital as the secure the maintenance of rare educational resources and recognition of their significance. Given the situation, it is recommended that an administration should charge nominal fees for all museums in order to sustain efforts in preservation of history and culture.
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment ? 84
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in house compared with living in an apartment. 73
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in preservation of history and culture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7052238806 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12593715064 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3073632822 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170275166219 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541684821327 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542476539967 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110219935252 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629349784254 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.