Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Amid rising technological innovation, there was an ignited debate that whether it's time for historical values to come to the edge of collapse. The vast majority of people believe that it does not do to dwell on the past and forget to live while the rest protect their opinion that still historical knowledge plays an irreplaceable role in human development process. In this light, I would argue that history is an evergreen value which mankind is obligated to study.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that young generation should focus on scientific front to meet the pace of times. The whole concept of this move is to equip our descendants a comprehensive understanding in term of science to confront the deadly issues to come such as global warming, artificial intelligence, or even worse the Apocalypse, which is no longer a fictional scenario. For instance, scientific subjects have been intentionally included in university’s curriculum in several decades that resulted in the rise of new groups of scientists who play an irreplaceable role in technological enterprises like SpaceX or Tesla. These kinds of enterprise would be the realm of men to survive the darkest scenarios. It is understandable to share this view.
On the other hand, history is the decisive factor that shaped personal dignity as well as national identity. In fact, history is a mirror reflecting humans’ civilization through the course of time. Only in researching the repeating events can we truly achieve a comprehensive vision. On the personal front, digging into history means to learn from a massive reference that, for generations, has guided us through the darkness of evil things. For example, studying what drove an innocent Hitler into a wicked leader, our young generation would avoid being charmed into crimes. On the national front, or even on global scale, history is the decisive key to maintain the tradition, culture, and the moral standards of distinct groups of people. In the era of 4.0 globalization, the erosion of national identity has happened at an ever-increasing rate. It is the loss of national values to be blamed for irreconcilable conflicts within each nation. For instance, the rise of yellow vest protest in Paris in recent days could take its root from an underlying issue: culture clash. As a person with amnesia is no longer that person, a nation without a memory is no longer that nation. Hence, history, which play an important role in maintaining the precious values, should gain proper attention from both people and the administration.
In conclusion, while the true value of history is beyond question, those who affected by the current trend did believe that we can learn from the past nothing but the impractical knowledge. However, as long as humans consider our world through a multidimensional lens, still history is the decisive key for building a better world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | Sahejpreet | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Ibknaanii | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | ngan phan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | trungtrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | kubra | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today’s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. Do you agree or disagree? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 70
- Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view. 84
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past”. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 474.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14135021097 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01720587751 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4741262645 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.047619048 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180146718399 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486360923724 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457204171639 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114097264858 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509348887426 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.