The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Nowadays, there is a different point of the view about who can be the greatness of individuals. Depending on personal experience and beliefs, we may find that some people hold the opinion that greatness only can be decided by those who live after them, while others have an opposite attitude that contemporaries also can make the decision. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the former statement. My view will explore by the following discussion.
Indeed, many greatest people were defined by the descendant. For example, the artists in Renaissance, the beginner of a country, and some of the CEOs in the biggest companies in the world are all the good instances to represent the topic of issue's statement. There is no doubt that sometimes people do not know what great people did at the time, and after a long time, when people try to understand that period of time, we just figure out that some people in that time really finished some greatest things, therefore, we admired about them.
On the other hand, sometimes descendants cannot have an objective judgment to ancestors because descendants might not consider the specific situation or environment which ancestors lived or met and use their own standards or value to make the reckless evaluation. Furthermore, taking descendants to judge who is the greatness of individuals might be wrong in itself due to the definition of greatness is based on the time and space background at the time, and different backgrounds of people, of course, have different thinking.
Besides, the basis for future generation to estimate predecessors only depends on the documents. However, no one can make sure that the documents definitely are right, because the documents still are the documents, which means we have few chances to obtain the information from documents and witnesses at the time same time. Moreover, we do not have the time machine, so we cannot jump back to see whether the documents are real or not. Hence, the completeness and substantiation of these records and documents and whether they are the judgment of other people also compromise the accuracy and objectivity of judging.
In conclusion, despite the fact that many descendants make many evaluations to ancestors, there are still many factors we should consider discreetly. Therefore, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Dipper | 50 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been 3
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in t 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 52
- Do you agree or disagree with that the most important thing people learned is form families? 73
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...issance, the beginner of a country, and some of the CEOs in the biggest companies in the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ime, when people try to understand that period of time, we just figure out that some people in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14545454545 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91161764109 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5079120785 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0666666667 5.21951772744 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207555751157 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601495749886 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102779731941 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112577096093 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130633092273 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.