Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers?
In recent years, there has been colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the importance of unnecessary over packaging products, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In my view, over packaging should be avoided.
Over the past few years there has been an ongoing heated debate between prodigies about overpackaging of products. Few people believe that over packaging of goods is a good idea whether others maintain a view that it should be avoided. This essay will further discuss that we should avoid over packaging and come to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of benefits attributed to the less packaging of commodities. Firstly, the most conspicuous one is that over packaging increases the price of the product. Not only it hides the real product's condition from consumer but also damages the freshness of product. Thus, over packaging should be avoided as much as possible.
Another pivotal facet of the argument is that companies uses over packaging of products just to attract customers. Instead they should focus on the quality of product and not only on the packaging.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out a conclusion that over packaging is unnecessary and it's a collective responsibility of manufacturer, consumer and government to ensure the quality of products. Not only it will be beneficial from health perspective but also it will be environmental friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 85
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 80
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers? 72
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver packaging increases the price of the product. Not only it hides the real prod...
^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... of products just to attract customers. Instead they should focus on the quality of pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 122, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... that over packaging is unnecessary and its a collective responsibility of manufact...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, thus, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28326180258 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0343317287 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6651169086 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6923076923 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342231804027 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133968255678 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729541583761 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195846029594 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696260748286 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.