Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Over the past few years, there has been an ongoing heated debate between prodigies about learning through experience. Few people believe that learning through experience is an excellent platform to gain knowledge, while others maintain a view that books provide a better knowledge than experience. This essay will further elaborate both sides of the argument and come to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of benefits attributed to the experience in life. Firstly, the most conspicuous one is that experience is the knowledge gained from our day-to-day activities. Not every situation is mentioned in the books, a person should gain experience by practice. Handling a machine in a manufacturing sector, for instance, can be learned by seeing it's manual, but it can be handled better when you gain experience by practice under a guide supervision. Hence, needless to say, learning through experience will gain a better knowledge than reading books.
Another pivotal facet of the argument is that books provide basic knowledge of the subject, and it is not possible to provide solution for every problem. Books provide basic techniques such as selling, production, planning, and marketing, these techniques can be implemented well when a person gain experience in each area. However, to get a desire job a person should acquires basic knowledge by reading books. Therefore, books provide basic knowledge, which is required to a desire job, but experience can help to perform that job with a better understanding.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out a conclusion that books, parents, teachers only can provide guidelines and help us to learn basic knowledge of the subjects but learning through experiences in the situations are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 85
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and 77
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'acquire'
Suggestion: acquire
...er, to get a desire job a person should acquires basic knowledge by reading books. There...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31487889273 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93493740865 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7882105822 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102540003148 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437704529431 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290362383121 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628278298638 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247527036939 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.