The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050.
The bar chart compares the proportion of dependents in five various countries around the world between 2000 and 2050. It is obvious that the average percentage of world independents is predicted to rise to about 42% in 2050 from around 25% in 2000.
In 2000, of all the five countries, India possessed the highest percentage dependents, with almost 40%, while Korea owned the lowest proportion—just below 20%, less than the world average. The number of dependents in the rest countries—Indonesia, China, Japan—was the same, at about 35%.
In the future of 2050, the rising trends happen in Indonesia, China, Korea, and Japan. The ratio of the dependents in Korea is estimated to ascend most greatly to about 42% in 2050, which will be as large as that of the world. Japan is forecast to increase by 12% during the fifty years, possessing the largest rate of independents of the five(47%) in 2050. It is of interest to notice that the increase of dependents in Indonesia and China is expected to be the same, from 35% in 2000 to 39% in 2050. However, in India, the number of the dependents is expected to decline to around 30% in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-16 | EriolYang | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- There is a controversial view about whether group learning or independent learning is a better way to students’ study at school. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion. 73
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76262626263 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94037003475 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520202020202 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6573018927 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404336718604 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17335136388 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150277412957 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306045834381 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167713327627 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.