In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents?
Nowadays, many hold the view that the policy which plans to build separated zones for different uses is of positive effect. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that separated regions have many disadvantages. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and give my own opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that this plan could help people to find their destination easily. For example, we may have a purpose of buying something and the separated region for shopping make the shopping malls gathering together in order that we can find the thing we want to buy easily instead of finding here and there in a combination region. In addition, this policy makes the government administrate the sector better as the gathering of similar uses of the region lead to a clearly construction of the city, the function of a sector is obvious therefore easier to be managed by the government.
On the other hand, nonetheless, people would be bothered due to the problems aroused by the far distance between different regions may also be obvious. To be specific, people need to spend more time on the travel from one sector to another if they want to make use of two regions, such as working and shopping. Furthermore, separated planning declines the cooperation between different fields. Since the plan sets the areas for different uses far from each other, different areas may be are hard to create a connection due to the distance, activities like commercial advertisement in campus may be less possible.
To summarise, there is no doubt that the policy of setting separated regions could help people find destination easily and make the government convenient to manage the city. At the same time, nevertheless, the long distance could bother people and cut down the connection between different parts. In the final analysis, therefore, one can conclude that the negative effect of separated design outweigh the positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-02 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 56
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that the policy which plans to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('clearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('construction') instead of another adjective.
...g of similar uses of the region lead to a clearly construction of the city, the function of a sector i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, as for, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73850147651 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1754131762 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182762775096 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687849191529 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525016742477 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117780845223 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046920179634 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.