The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
The pie chart enumerates the information regarding the amount of uk students who replies the query about managing finance while tabular chart depicts the percentage of people who organised from different age group.
It is vivid, the first illustration articulates about the highest proportion of the students who respond around 55℅ there were able to manage their finance fairly and 20℅ of the respondent said, but they were not able to organise well. Similarly, the lower 4% of pupils were not organised their finance where as the 21% of students were better in organising the finance.
Turning to the second chart, it is clearly seen from the illustration the students who belongs from age group of over 36-year-old organised their finance well, where as the students who between 26 to 25 years manage their finance well but not considerable. the students who aged up to 26 years their performance of managing finance is very lower about 18%
Overall, it is clear that most of the students' answers are fairly organised. The number of students in the age group of over 36 years is very organised.
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 73
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 67
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 56
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 73
- Some people think that video games are advantageous, while others believe video games are harmful tothe people who play them.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...pupils were not organised their finance where as the 21% of students were better in orga...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...-year-old organised their finance well, where as the students who between 26 to 25 years...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...heir finance well but not considerable. the students who aged up to 26 years their ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, similarly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00540540541 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62044554283 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6036917619 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864070646613 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572177006144 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023559953196 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674591139286 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364529408429 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.