The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The given table and pie charts illustrate the changes in terms of income and expenditure on groceries and clothes in a typical household living in a city located in the UK between 2010 and 2013.
Overall, surprisingly whereas the total income was slightly decreased over 3 years, the food and clothes consumption increased considerably. In addition, when looking deeply at the showed pie chart, inhabitants living in the urban area spend more on fruits, vegetables, clothes, and dairy food compared with an opposite change in meat and fist expenditures.
First of all, the period showed a minor decline in the total income value that was at 29,000 pounds in the beginning and then 25,000 pounds in 2013. In contrast, spending on food and clothes was increased by 1,000 pounds on average to 15,000 pounds in the end of surveyed time.
In addition, when looking at the details of expenditures on different categories of food and clothes, the percentages of fruits and vegetables grew by 15% along with a slight increase in the figure for dairy products that jumped from 15% to 20% over the period. While the proportion of other food and drink spending was remained at 18%, both portions of expenditures on clothes, meat and fish felt by 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | To Rang | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | dattien | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that famous people’s support towards international aid organisations draw attention to problems and contribute significantly for their achievements. Do you agree or disagree? 93
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadaysnew technology is increasingly being used to teach students. 73
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment. What causes global warming? What solution is there to this problem? 89
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development 100
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95714285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70315596187 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7031236373 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209877634732 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974497836501 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059420857815 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130210217057 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599405834943 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.