the line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu company in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.
The given line graph depicts the fluctuation of Outokumpu’s share price from the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2010. Units are measured in euros.
Overall, the price of Outokumpu’s share experienced numerous striking changed before standing at a little bit lower point compared to the starting point.
It is evident that in the first two studied years, the share price of the company was noticeably higher. Starting at about 13 euros in 2006, the price escalated and peaked at 32 euros in the beginning of 2007. Despite a downward trend until the early 2008, it climbed dramatically to approximately 30 euros after six months.
However, afterwards the company went through a period in which its share price was much lower than in the previous years. The figure suddenly plunged to a low of only seven euros per share at the end of 2008. After a small recovery, several volatilities were witnessed and at the end of 2009, investors could buy the company’s share with around 12 euros per share.
- the bar chart below shows the three min causes of land damage in four different areas in the world. 78
- the table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, chothing and entertainment. 84
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 69
- the line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu company in euros between January 2006 and December 2010. 84
- the following graph compares the rates of immigration to New Zealand from four countries between 2001 and 2005 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s striking changed before standing at a little bit lower point compared to the starting po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93567251462 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83760141781 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2303473719 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310024838064 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119100977646 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845081548676 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188489026357 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577058606216 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.