The chart demonstrates how often American residents go to eat at fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
More than three-quarters of people in the USA went where they ate fast food at least once or twice a month or even several times a week regardless of what period it is. Among the majority of frequencies, there is a similar trend between the rate of several times a week and going there weekly, both increasing slightly first before falling back to around 16% and 28% respectively in 2013. By contrast, the proportion of people eating fast food once or twice a month had decreased to just 25% by 2006 before growing dramatically to approximately 33% by the end of this period.
On the other hand, as for the minority of frequencies, the percentage of people who opted to eat there every day almost halved, declining from 4% in 2003 to 2% in 2006 before leveling off. Besides, the frequency of never going saw a similar trend, falling between just 5% and around 4%, and then was unchanged till 2013. In contrast, the proportion of those only getting there a few times a year had risen to just 15% by 2006 before keeping constant.
Overall, more American residents would reduce the frequency of eating at fast food restaurants to lead a healthier life.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 67
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university, in order to travel or to work. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects should not worry about producing building as a work of art 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart demonstrates how often America...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, then, as for, at least, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.681765751 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7737921713 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25971277594 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110430277417 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904802568857 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152056862966 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875519532653 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.