TASK: some people think that in order to improve the quality of education, students should be encouraged to evaluate and critician, but other people maintain that such evaluation and criticism may cause lots of respects for teachers’ discipline.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The issue of whether students should be stimulated to contribute to teachers’ lessons at schools, either criticism or amelioration, remains a subject of intense debate. In my opinion, it seems to me that the potential benefits gained outweigh the possible dangers.
On the one hand, there are several major reasons why it is essential to encourage students to raise voice in class. To begin with, the obligation to build the lessons along with teachers provides children a range of opportunities to develop critical thinking skills as well as research skills. To take research skill as an example, only if students prepare themselves sufficient source of knowledge and information relating to the upcoming lessons in advance can they collaborate with their teachers and manage what they should learn. On top of that, despite spending a considerable amount of time on preparing at home beforehand, children then may get used to loads of new information, which presumably accelerates their learning process. Thus, it can be concluded that this encouragement has a positive effect on students’ academic performance.
On the other hand, it is perhaps even more crucial to take the drawbacks of matter into account. There are two main reasons. First of all, the sense of irrespective among youngsters towards their teachers inevitably hits home provided that there is no proper guidance from teachers and responsible adults. To hit this one on the head, owing to being used to the type of spoon-feeding education, it would be difficult for students to accommodate their learning styles to liberal arts education, which allows children to criticize and amend teachers regularly. Secondly, when there are loads of comments given arbitrarily, the class will soon become a chaos as students do not comprehend what their teachers is delivering and react irrespectively instead. All in all, it can be argued that encouraging children to raise voice in class is not the most effective strategy to enhance their learning outcomes.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against whether we should stimulate students in terms of giving feedbacks towards teachers. However, it is my personal belief that it may have an adverse impact on either children’s attitudes or academic results.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 89
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 92
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- In the modern world, it is possile to shop, work, and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with. Is it a positive or negative development in you opinion? 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respectively instead. All in all, it can be argued that encouraging children to r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0173928752 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6504408772 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178358183152 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056297972713 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422832728829 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107318270873 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133230429164 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.